Man fined for raw milk products sale

7 February 2011 | by Rosemary Ryan

Print this article Comments Bookmark and Share

A man found guilty of 43 charges relating to breaches of the Food Act has been fined $53,000 for various offences relating to the sale of unpasteurised milk and unpasteurised dairy products.

Primary Industries minister Steve Whan said the court found that the defendant “in a display of deceptive and deceitful conduct, sold unpasteurised dairy products that were deliberately mislabelled and camouflaged as cosmetic products when the intention was they be used for human consumption”.

"In conducting his business, the defendant placed the health and safety of his customers at significant risk,” Mr Whan said in a media release.

"There is sound scientific evidence pointing to the risks associated with consuming raw milk. To ensure that cows milk and cows milk products sold in NSW are safe they go through the NSW Food Authority’s stringent food safety management programs, which includes pasteurisation."

Mr Whan said the issue of the sale of unpasteurised milk products in NSW was a divisive one amongst some sectors of the dairy industry and advocate groups, but the NSW Government “made no apologies for giving paramount consideration to the public interest and the need to protect public health”.

In sentencing, Chief Industrial Magistrate GJT Hart said the evidence provided suggested the defendant had no scientific, medical or other qualification or expertise in the field.

"The Defendant appears to have a propensity for adopting, and then advocating with vigour, the teachings of the unqualified, whilst preferring to ignore the available literature produced by people with relevant scientific qualifications,” Magistrate Hart said.

The offences relate to the sale of unpasteurised milk and unpasteurised dairy products, including cottage cheese, butter and yoghurt that were manufactured at the defendant’s Bondi Junction residence and sold over the internet and at an organic food market in Sydney’s Bondi Junction.

Additional offences include the sale of other goods including chocolate, pumpkin seeds and cranberries that were labelled with health claims in contravention of the Food Standards Code.


Tags: cheese | food safety | NSW Food Authority

Just in:


Add a comment5 Comments

  1. Gareth | 1 May, 2012 at 10:50 AM
    http://www.realmilk.com/ Would love to see their 'Sound Scientific Research" and if that research is not funded by the food industry and is indeed neutral. I would suggest people do their own research into raw milk (i.e look up the book "Milk the Deadly poison")
  2. Aaron | 11 February, 2011 at 07:24 AM
    @Mick I sure hope you aren't implying that the citation you are providing backs your opinion that raw milk is dangerous to the public. Look at any branded, long-established raw-milk business in California, and you will find a completely different picture. The cases of caused illness in the public over their history are either zero, or close to zero. Raw milk regulations are so strict, you just don't get away with causing illness in the public and survive as a business. That is why the raw milk is actually significantly safer than pasteurized milk. If you go citing "rogue" cases of raw milk outbreaks and then compare that to a regulated milk industry, you are presenting biased statistics. A comparison of branded, long-established raw-milk business compared to branded, long-established pasteurized milk businesses will rule out confounding factors which would be present on one side of the comparison, but not on the other.
  3. Aaron | 11 February, 2011 at 06:54 AM
    @Mick Although you seem to imply that Australians are the more wise; perhaps it could be the other way around? You should consider all possibilities. I am skeptical of anyone who claims *absolute* knowledge. Given that the safety of raw milk is in debate throughout the world, I doubt that a verdict has been reached. But maybe Australians have some inside knowledge they are not sharing with the rest of us?
  4. Mick | 9 February, 2011 at 04:44 PM
    Maybe in these other countries their politicians are just easily swayed by the ignorant. The Australians aren't. http://www.realrawmilkfacts.com/scientific-references/
  5. Gordon S Watson | 8 February, 2011 at 11:22 AM
    if raw milk is so dangerous, how come it's perfectly legal for sale in New Zealand? Or California, where 60,000 people purchase it every day? Or Great Britain? What is it the dairymen of the EU know, to produce it safely, that they haven't yet learned in Oz?

Add a new comment

Enter the code shown:

Valentine's Day - lover or hater? There's no escaping the 14th of February. How do you feel about this loved-up day?
Love it - the more love around, the better!
 
57%
Hate it - I want to hide under a rock and binge on chocolate.
 
14%
It's just a money making day for restaurants, florists and Hallmark.
 
14%
I don't really care
 
14%
The poll is closed.

Directory

Latest Video